Comments on: Chanel Preview – Robertson Boulevard Collection

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 22 May 2008 08:19:00 +0000

those colors are gorgeous but defenitely noth worth the price! i love chanel dearly and use or at least have used many of their beauty products and can absolutely say that it’s not worth the $19 let alone $25. it is by no means chip resistant and it the brush and bottle are just awkward. perhaps within the first few hours it looks pretty and you feel like it’s worth the money but once time passes by you just feel like an idiot. word to the wise: dont get it. stick to their mascara or lip sticks.

By: Gina

Gina — Tue, 13 May 2008 13:41:00 +0000

After my previous experiences with Chanel (inefficient brushes, iffy opacity, serious chipping and wear issues – even with basecoat and topcoat reapplications), I can’t see shelling out $25. I can understand the allure, though: the colors are pretty, and of course, it’s Chanel. But it’s personally not a choice I’ll make again.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 12 May 2008 02:20:00 +0000

If you think its too expensive, dont buy it. More chances of me getting it
&& to make your chanel nail polish last longer, use base & top coat & paint the tips of your nails a little extra right before you seal it with a top coat.
first time i used chanel it chipped the first day, i re-applied to doing that, and it lasted a week with very few chips.

By: ocelot1

ocelot1 — Sat, 10 May 2008 18:30:00 +0000

i think its too expensive for colors that are so readily available elsewhere for a cheaper price tag. again, not unique enough for that price so i wont be slapping down any moola on these. now that kalediscope one i heard about…thats another story.

By: selkie

selkie — Fri, 09 May 2008 22:03:00 +0000

The purple is nice, maybe the pink, but I agree w/ Saysitopipi: when you can get such hi-quality n/p cheaply, why pay the $25?

Besides, isn't all this super-luxury stuff looking kind of tired lately with the emphasis on conservation, global warming, etc? Maybe it's just me.

And life's way too short to worry what other people think about your nail polish! Except when their opinion REALLY counts, like a job interview or a judge! :- D

By: georgia

georgia — Fri, 09 May 2008 15:46:00 +0000

oh my gosh these are so beautiful. i think i like the purple the best. i’m a big fan of the chanel polishes. i’ve found them to be pretty chip resistant, and while $25 is pretty steep for a polish, i just love seeing those pretty little bottles sitting on my shelf.

By: rach

rach — Fri, 09 May 2008 04:07:00 +0000

I’ve heard Chanel polishes chip like mad. I’ve yet to excuse spending $AUD35 on a nail polish, so I wouldn’t be able to say from experience. There’s a real trend towards punchy bright cremes at the moment, especially with Australian brands like Kit Cosmetics and Bloom, and the new OPI Brights is in the mail for me. So I think I might skip these.

I think that with other cosmetic items, like foundation and mascara, you can really see a difference with price. I can often by quite stingy, but you can take my NARS from my cold, dead hands. With nail polish, on the other hand, I think you can get truly great quality and innovative colour without the sticker shock.

That said, the purple is quite tempting…

By: BeautyChick101

BeautyChick101 — Thu, 08 May 2008 17:30:00 +0000

I am actually really excited for this. I think $25 is a lot, but I love Chanel … so I might have to splurge on a bottle or two!

By: Pinkerbelle

Pinkerbelle — Thu, 08 May 2008 14:37:00 +0000

Sadly, despite the price tag, I really want the pink and purple ;0) But I just look at it like this…if I can pay for MAC lippies and stuff like that, that will go bad WAY sooner than the nailpolish…its not that much different ;0)

By: vbie3714

vbie3714 — Thu, 08 May 2008 14:12:00 +0000

They want us to go broke! Of course I want 2 of them…